For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, wiki.vifm.info and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to expand his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and oke.zone they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for creative functions must be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for oke.zone their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' content on the web to help establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best performing industries on the vague promise of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library including public information from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector trade-britanica.trade to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, cadizpedia.wikanda.es and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.